<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Carrie Rome-Sievers, Barrister</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Developments in insolvency and commercial law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 05:11:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='carrieromesievers.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="Carrie Rome-Sievers, Barrister" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Newsflash &#8211; High Court grants special leave to appeal in Willmott Forests &#8211; disclaimer of leases</title>
		<link>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/05/11/newsflash-high-court-grants-special-leave-to-appeal-in-willmott-forests-disclaimer-of-leases/</link>
		<comments>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/05/11/newsflash-high-court-grants-special-leave-to-appeal-in-willmott-forests-disclaimer-of-leases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 05:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carrieromesievers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporations Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insolvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Managed Investment Schemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclaimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclaimer of leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclaimer of onerous property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquidators power of disclaimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[managed investment schemes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday the High Court granted special leave to appeal the Victorian Court of Appeal&#8217;s decision in Willmott Forests Ltd (Receivers and Managers appointed)(in liquidation) v Willmott Growers Group Inc and Willmott Action Group Inc [2012] VSCA 202. The transcript of the special &#8230; <a href="http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/05/11/newsflash-high-court-grants-special-leave-to-appeal-in-willmott-forests-disclaimer-of-leases/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=carrieromesievers.wordpress.com&#038;blog=28393226&#038;post=678&#038;subd=carrieromesievers&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/05/11/newsflash-high-court-grants-special-leave-to-appeal-in-willmott-forests-disclaimer-of-leases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/62848085bb3d92f95ae3723a3c046cf6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">carrieromesievers</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Provisional liquidators &#8211; principles as to appointment &#8211; ASIC v ActiveSuper</title>
		<link>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/04/23/provisional-liquidators-principles-as-to-appointment-asic-v-activesuper/</link>
		<comments>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/04/23/provisional-liquidators-principles-as-to-appointment-asic-v-activesuper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carrieromesievers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insolvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appointment of provisional liquidators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[just and equitable ground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provisional liquidators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/?p=673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month in ASIC v ActiveSuper Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 234, Gordon J considered an application by ASIC brought pursuant to s 472(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act) to have Michael McCann and Graham Killer of Grant Thornton &#8230; <a href="http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/04/23/provisional-liquidators-principles-as-to-appointment-asic-v-activesuper/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=carrieromesievers.wordpress.com&#038;blog=28393226&#038;post=673&#038;subd=carrieromesievers&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/04/23/provisional-liquidators-principles-as-to-appointment-asic-v-activesuper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/62848085bb3d92f95ae3723a3c046cf6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">carrieromesievers</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Victorian Supreme Court costs – the party/party is over</title>
		<link>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/27/victorian-supreme-court-costs-the-partyparty-is-over/</link>
		<comments>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/27/victorian-supreme-court-costs-the-partyparty-is-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carrieromesievers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs in the Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party/party costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solicitor/client costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of Victoria]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/27/victorian-supreme-court-costs-the-partyparty-is-over/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged from Paul Duggan: No April Fool’s Day jokes please. Effective 1 April 2013 the Victorian Supreme Court has a new costs regime. The highlights: The ‘party and party basis’ (by which most Supreme Court cost bills have historically been &#8230; <a href="http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/27/victorian-supreme-court-costs-the-partyparty-is-over/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=carrieromesievers.wordpress.com&#038;blog=28393226&#038;post=671&#038;subd=carrieromesievers&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/27/victorian-supreme-court-costs-the-partyparty-is-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/62848085bb3d92f95ae3723a3c046cf6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">carrieromesievers</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update &#8211; ATO&#8217;s statement on unfair preference case and reallocation of payments</title>
		<link>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/update-atos-statement-on-unfair-preference-case-and-reallocation-of-payments/</link>
		<comments>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/update-atos-statement-on-unfair-preference-case-and-reallocation-of-payments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 06:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carrieromesievers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporations Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insolvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reallocation of payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third party preferences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/?p=667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year I reviewed the Federal Court&#8217;s decision and the Full Federal Court&#8217;s decision on appeal in a third party preference case against the Commissioner of Taxation, which had an interesting twist. My review of the first instance decision of &#8230; <a href="http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/update-atos-statement-on-unfair-preference-case-and-reallocation-of-payments/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=carrieromesievers.wordpress.com&#038;blog=28393226&#038;post=667&#038;subd=carrieromesievers&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/update-atos-statement-on-unfair-preference-case-and-reallocation-of-payments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/62848085bb3d92f95ae3723a3c046cf6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">carrieromesievers</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newflash: The Banks win special leave to appeal Bell Group to the High Court</title>
		<link>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/newflash-the-banks-win-special-leave-to-appeal-bell-group-to-the-high-court/</link>
		<comments>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/newflash-the-banks-win-special-leave-to-appeal-bell-group-to-the-high-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 01:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carrieromesievers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporations Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equity and Trusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barnes v addy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bell group appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowing receipt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/?p=664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is being reported that this morning, Westpac and the other 19 banks in the Bell Group litigation have won special leave to appeal their loss last year in the West Australian courts to the High Court of Australia. At &#8230; <a href="http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/newflash-the-banks-win-special-leave-to-appeal-bell-group-to-the-high-court/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=carrieromesievers.wordpress.com&#038;blog=28393226&#038;post=664&#038;subd=carrieromesievers&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/newflash-the-banks-win-special-leave-to-appeal-bell-group-to-the-high-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/62848085bb3d92f95ae3723a3c046cf6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">carrieromesievers</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Refusal to adjourn winding up application, despite tax appeal</title>
		<link>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/refusal-to-adjourn-winding-up-application-despite-tax-appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/refusal-to-adjourn-winding-up-application-despite-tax-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carrieromesievers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporations Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insolvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjournment of wind up applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statutory demands by the ATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winding up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winding up applications by the ATO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/?p=660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, the Federal Court gave judgment in Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Bayconnection Property Developments Pty Ltd (no 2) [2013] FCA 208 (link). The case is a handy illustration of the fact that where the Commissioner applies to wind up &#8230; <a href="http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/refusal-to-adjourn-winding-up-application-despite-tax-appeal/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=carrieromesievers.wordpress.com&#038;blog=28393226&#038;post=660&#038;subd=carrieromesievers&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/refusal-to-adjourn-winding-up-application-despite-tax-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/62848085bb3d92f95ae3723a3c046cf6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">carrieromesievers</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ASIC Information Sheet 165 &#8211; Legal Professional Privilege and Responding to Compulsory Production Notices</title>
		<link>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/asic-information-sheet-165-legal-professional-privilege-and-responding-to-compulsory-production-notices/</link>
		<comments>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/asic-information-sheet-165-legal-professional-privilege-and-responding-to-compulsory-production-notices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carrieromesievers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporations Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Sheet 165]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal professional privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voluntary disclosure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late last year (13 December 2012) ASIC released its Information Sheet 165 outlining the approach it takes to claims of legal professional privilege (LPP). ASIC has compulsory information gathering powers to require disclosure of information. This power may be exercised &#8230; <a href="http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/asic-information-sheet-165-legal-professional-privilege-and-responding-to-compulsory-production-notices/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=carrieromesievers.wordpress.com&#038;blog=28393226&#038;post=625&#038;subd=carrieromesievers&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/asic-information-sheet-165-legal-professional-privilege-and-responding-to-compulsory-production-notices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/62848085bb3d92f95ae3723a3c046cf6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">carrieromesievers</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsflash: ITSA&#8217;s new Online Service for Bankruptcy Notices commences today</title>
		<link>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/11/newsflash-itsas-new-online-service-for-bankruptcy-notices-commences-today/</link>
		<comments>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/11/newsflash-itsas-new-online-service-for-bankruptcy-notices-commences-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carrieromesievers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insolvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy notices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online bankruptcy notices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/?p=654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ITSA (Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia) has been developing a re-designed website with new online services to be rolled out. Today it has announced the launch of stage 1 of its new online service to enable its personal insolvency clients to &#8230; <a href="http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/11/newsflash-itsas-new-online-service-for-bankruptcy-notices-commences-today/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=carrieromesievers.wordpress.com&#038;blog=28393226&#038;post=654&#038;subd=carrieromesievers&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/11/newsflash-itsas-new-online-service-for-bankruptcy-notices-commences-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/62848085bb3d92f95ae3723a3c046cf6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">carrieromesievers</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Statutory demands from the Tax Office &#8211; HC Legal Pty Ltd v DCOT [2013] FCA 45</title>
		<link>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/statutory-demands-from-the-tax-office-hc-legal-pty-ltd-v-dcot-2013-fca-45/</link>
		<comments>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/statutory-demands-from-the-tax-office-hc-legal-pty-ltd-v-dcot-2013-fca-45/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carrieromesievers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporations Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insolvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application to review the decision of a Federal Court Registrar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applications to set aside statutory demands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rehearing de novo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statutory demands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statutory demands by the ATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statutory demands from the tax ofice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statutory demands in respect of tax liabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/?p=618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday the Federal Court dismissed an application by a company trading as a law firm to set aside a statutory demand issued by the ATO. It is an interesting case and the judgment provides a useful reminder that even though &#8230; <a href="http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/statutory-demands-from-the-tax-office-hc-legal-pty-ltd-v-dcot-2013-fca-45/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=carrieromesievers.wordpress.com&#038;blog=28393226&#038;post=618&#038;subd=carrieromesievers&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/statutory-demands-from-the-tax-office-hc-legal-pty-ltd-v-dcot-2013-fca-45/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/62848085bb3d92f95ae3723a3c046cf6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">carrieromesievers</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting UK decision on legal professional privilege and its application to advice by accountants</title>
		<link>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/03/interesting-uk-decision-on-legal-professional-privilege-and-its-application-to-advice-by-accountants/</link>
		<comments>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/03/interesting-uk-decision-on-legal-professional-privilege-and-its-application-to-advice-by-accountants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 12:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carrieromesievers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal advice privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal professional privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privilege]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 23 January 2013 the UK Supreme Court handed down a very interesting decision on the question of whether the UK legal advice privilege (LAP) extended, or should be extended, so as to apply to legal advice given by someone other &#8230; <a href="http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/03/interesting-uk-decision-on-legal-professional-privilege-and-its-application-to-advice-by-accountants/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=carrieromesievers.wordpress.com&#038;blog=28393226&#038;post=470&#038;subd=carrieromesievers&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carrieromesievers.wordpress.com/2013/02/03/interesting-uk-decision-on-legal-professional-privilege-and-its-application-to-advice-by-accountants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/62848085bb3d92f95ae3723a3c046cf6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">carrieromesievers</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
